Consumer Cyclical / Packaging & ContainersNasdaqCM
$3.50
-0.18 (-4.85%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 33% · confianza 23%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.4M · quality 31.0/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
23/100
D
Piotroski
2/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$9M
P/E
N/A
•EV/EBITDA
N/A
•ROE
-29.6%
↓Gross Margin
18.2%
↓Debt/Equity
1.30
↑TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2010–2025 · 15 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
—
FCF CAGR
—
FCF margin
-0.9%
FCF / Net income
0.07x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $19.7M · net income $-2.5M · FCF $-172000.0
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | |||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $19.7M | $19.7M | $18.0M | $17.8M | $18.0M | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Income | $-2.5M | $-2.5M | $-1.5M | $-235000.00 | $-1.5M | $-8.3M | $-4.4M | $-7.1M | $-3.6M | $-1.6M | $700000.00 | $1.0M | $514318.00 | $375509.00 | $101749.00 | $483910.00 | $1.8M |
| EBITDA | $-1.0M | $-1.0M | $-292000.00 | $672000.00 | $-634000.00 | $-44000.00 | — | $-2.0M | $621903.00 | $2.2M | $4.3M | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS | -1.01 | -1.01 | -0.07 | -0.10 | -2.20 | -20.10 | -15.20 | -18.60 | -10.00 | -4.40 | 1.80 | 3.00 | 1.50 | 1.10 | 0.30 | 1.50 | 6.00 |
| Gross Margin | 18.2% | 18.2% | 20.1% | 18.3% | 17.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.4% | -10.4% | -3.4% | -2.2% | -6.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net Margin | -12.8% | -12.8% | -8.3% | -1.3% | -8.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Balance Sheet | |||||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.07 | 2.78 | 3.18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.35 | 0.31 | 0.61 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.35 | — |
| Current Ratio | 1.40 | 1.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $-172000.00 | $-172000.00 | $-1.6M | $-1.4M | $2.2M | $-3.8M | — | — | — | $506200.00 | $-1.1M | — | — | — | $-3.3M | $-288934.00 | $1.2M |
| Returns | |||||||||||||||||
| ROE | -29.6% | -29.6% | -14.0% | -6.3% | -53.4% | -204.2% | -373.5% | -359.4% | -48.9% | -14.1% | 5.5% | 8.2% | 4.0% | 3.0% | 0.8% | 4.1% | 15.5% |
| Valuation | |||||||||||||||||
| EV/EBITDA | — | — | — | 68.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.48 | 9.78 | 4.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | |||||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | 9.8% | 9.8% | 0.8% | -1.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth | -1342.9% | -1342.9% | 30.0% | 95.5% | — | -32.2% | 18.3% | -86.0% | -127.3% | -344.4% | -40.0% | 100.0% | 36.4% | 266.7% | -80.0% | -75.0% | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
-55.7%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
-0.07 → -1.01
Residual
-55.7%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.