StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
YTV.F$4.26-1.41%
Fair $4.26+0.0%

YTV.F

Rokiskio Suris AB

Consumer Defensive / Packaged FoodsFrankfurt

$4.26

-0.06 (-1.41%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4.26Fund rank 27/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $13.1M · quality 47.7/100

Data gap 27/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 18/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · YTV.FLocal privado en este navegador · Rokiskio Suris AB
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$137M

P/E

7.9x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.1x

↓

ROE

10.7%

↑

Gross Margin

11.4%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$4
$4$5

TradingView lightweight chart

YTV.F price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4.200Periodo +46.9%
Fair value: $4.260

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

3.3%

FCF / Net income

0.76x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $402.7M · net income $17.2M · FCF $13.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

11.4%+0.3% pts

Operating margin

4.7%+0.3% pts

Net margin

4.3%+0.8% pts

FCF margin

3.3%+4.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$402.7M$402.7M$370.3M$304.3M$359.3M
Net Income$17.2M$17.2M$22.8M$16.2M$12.5M
EBITDA$30.4M$30.4M$37.3M$29.7M$22.9M
EPS——0.730.460.36
Gross Margin11.4%11.4%13.7%14.1%11.1%
Operating Margin4.7%4.7%7.1%6.7%4.5%
Net Margin4.3%4.3%6.2%5.3%3.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.230.310.24
Current Ratio2.412.41———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$13.1M$13.1M$20.8M$-9.3M$-2.5M
Returns
ROE10.7%10.7%15.3%11.6%9.7%
Valuation
P/E7.897.894.966.047.94
EV/EBITDA5.155.153.904.615.45
P/B0.840.840.760.700.76
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth8.7%8.7%21.7%-15.3%—
EPS Growth——58.7%27.8%—
Dividend Yield4.8%4.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +16.5%

Total return

+16.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.73 → n/d

Residual

+11.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+4.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+11.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.