StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ZEHN.SW$63.30-2.01%
Fair $63.30+0.0%

ZEHN.SW

Zehnder Group AG

Industrials / Building Products & EquipmentSwiss

$63.30

-1.30 (-2.01%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $63.30Fund rank 33/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $62.8M · quality 64.7/100

Data gap 33/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 75/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ZEHN.SWLocal privado en este navegador · Zehnder Group AG
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$704M

P/E

16.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.7x

↓

ROE

17.9%

↑

Gross Margin

65.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$63
$62$91

TradingView lightweight chart

ZEHN.SW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $63.30Periodo +197.9%
Fair value: $63.30

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-2.2%

FCF CAGR

+24.9%

FCF margin

8.3%

FCF / Net income

1.36x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $760.7M · net income $46.3M · FCF $62.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

65.5%+5.8% pts

Operating margin

8.2%-0.6% pts

Net margin

6.1%-0.7% pts

FCF margin

8.3%+4.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$760.7M$760.7M$705.8M$762.1M$812.5M
Net Income$46.3M$46.3M$1.7M$43.2M$55.4M
EBITDA$85.7M$85.7M$40.0M$82.5M$95.7M
EPS——0.153.834.83
Gross Margin65.5%65.5%65.1%62.7%59.7%
Operating Margin8.2%8.2%5.2%8.0%8.8%
Net Margin6.1%6.1%0.2%5.7%6.8%
Balance Sheet
Current Ratio1.561.56———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$62.8M$62.8M$43.4M$64.5M$32.2M
Returns
ROE17.9%17.9%0.7%13.0%17.1%
Valuation
P/E16.7016.70308.0013.3912.34
EV/EBITDA7.757.7511.456.086.56
P/B2.722.722.211.742.11
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.8%7.8%-7.4%-6.2%—
EPS Growth——-96.1%-20.7%—
Dividend Yield2.2%2.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +1.0%

Total return

+1.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.15 → n/d

Residual

-1.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.