StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ZNTL$3.72-5.82%
Fair $3.72+0.0%

ZNTL

Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Healthcare / BiotechnologyNasdaqGM

$3.72

-0.23 (-5.82%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.72Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-171.1M · quality 69.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 34/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 7Warnings: 1unknown: 7
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific biotech pipeline model required: targets are disabled until product, probability, peak-sales and cash-runway data exists. ROE is -63.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ZNTLLocal privado en este navegador · Zentalis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$265M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-63.4%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$4
$1$7

TradingView lightweight chart

ZNTL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.720Periodo -84.0%
Fair value: $3.720

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2019–2025 · 6 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.91x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-137.1M · FCF $-125.2M

2019-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
Income Statement
Revenue——$67.4M—————
Net Income$-137.1M$-137.1M$-165.8M$-292.2M$-236.8M$-158.7M$-117.8M$-45.7M
EBITDA$-144.3M$-144.3M$-186.2M$-252.6M$-225.9M$-216.0M$-118.6M$-46.7M
EPS——-2.33-4.47-4.48-3.72-4.19-8.16
Operating Margin——-278.0%—————
Net Margin——-246.0%—————
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.120.100.10———
Current Ratio6.196.19——————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-125.2M$-125.2M$-171.1M$-208.4M$-166.3M$-160.2M$-87.6M$-39.5M
Returns
ROE-63.4%-63.4%-49.2%-66.8%-54.6%———
Valuation
P/B1.191.190.682.302.58———
Growth & Yield
EPS Growth——47.9%0.2%—11.2%48.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +173.5%

Total return

+173.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-2.33 → n/d

Residual

+173.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+173.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.