StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0170.KL$0.03+20.00%
Fair $0.03+0.0%

0170.KL

Kanger International Berhad

Basic Materials / Lumber & Wood ProductionKuala Lumpur

$0.03

+0.00 (+20.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.03Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 3/F
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 15%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-9.0M · quality 36.3/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 17/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

3/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -0.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 0170.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Kanger International Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$28M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-0.5%

↓

Gross Margin

3.5%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0170.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.030Periodo -99.0%
Fair value: $0.030

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-41.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-19.8%

FCF / Net income

7.98x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $45.5M · net income $-1.1M · FCF $-9.0M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

3.5%+0.8% pts

Operating margin

-1.8%+87.5% pts

Net margin

-2.5%+65.5% pts

FCF margin

-19.8%+40.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$45.5M$45.5M$36.8M$222.7M
Net Income$-1.1M$-1.1M$-18.0M$-151.5M
EBITDA$-747000.00$-747000.00$-15.2M$-142.9M
EPS-0.00-0.00-0.03-0.34
Gross Margin3.5%3.5%8.6%2.6%
Operating Margin-1.8%-1.8%-37.5%-89.3%
Net Margin-2.5%-2.5%-49.0%-68.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———0.02
Current Ratio1.751.75——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-9.0M$-9.0M$58.6M$-135.0M
Returns
ROE-0.5%-0.5%-8.5%-50.5%
Valuation
P/B0.120.120.140.16
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth23.6%23.6%-83.5%—
EPS Growth94.8%94.8%92.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -25.0%

Total return

-25.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.03 → -0.00

Residual

-25.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-25.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.