StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
0331.KL$0.19+0.00%
Fair $0.19+0.0%

0331.KL

Cropmate Berhad

Basic Materials / Agricultural InputsKuala Lumpur

$0.19

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.19Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 47/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $9.8M · quality 48.7/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 19/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

47/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 0331.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Cropmate Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$140M

P/E

9.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

5.8x

↓

ROE

15.3%

↑

Gross Margin

17.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.20

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

0331.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.190Periodo -9.5%
Fair value: $0.190

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+1.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-10.8%

FCF / Net income

-1.45x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $196.5M · net income $14.7M · FCF $-21.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

17.2%-0.7% pts

Operating margin

9.8%-1.0% pts

Net margin

7.5%-0.3% pts

FCF margin

-10.8%-9.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$196.5M$196.5M$160.7M$151.5M$188.3M
Net Income$14.7M$14.7M$11.9M$10.1M$14.6M
EBITDA$22.4M$22.4M$18.9M$16.9M$23.0M
EPS——0.020.010.02
Gross Margin17.2%17.2%18.4%18.2%17.9%
Operating Margin9.8%9.8%10.4%9.6%10.7%
Net Margin7.5%7.5%7.4%6.6%7.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.200.200.260.891.29
Current Ratio3.573.57———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-21.3M$-21.3M$14.5M$9.8M$-2.7M
Returns
ROE15.3%15.3%13.9%27.1%47.1%
Valuation
P/E9.509.5012.42——
EV/EBITDA5.795.798.11——
P/B1.461.461.73——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth22.3%22.3%6.0%-19.5%—
EPS Growth——18.2%-31.2%—
Dividend Yield3.2%3.2%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5.9%

Total return

+5.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.02 → n/d

Residual

+2.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.2%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+2.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.