StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1004.HK$0.24+0.41%
Fair $0.24+0.0%

1004.HK

China Smarter Energy Group Holdings Limited

Utilities / Utilities - RenewableHKSE

$0.24

+0.00 (+0.41%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.24Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 21/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 26% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $124.6M · quality 60.3/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 50/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

21/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 1004.HKLocal privado en este navegador · China Smarter Energy Group Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$115M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

26.3x

↑

ROE

39.2%

↑

Gross Margin

42.5%

↑

Debt/Equity

-5.63

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

1004.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.245Periodo -97.5%
Fair value: $0.245

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2022 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-3.6%

FCF CAGR

-44.2%

FCF margin

45.5%

FCF / Net income

-0.94x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $195.9M · net income $-94.7M · FCF $89.2M

2021-FY → 2022-FY

Gross margin

42.5%+1.0% pts

Operating margin

15.3%+8.1% pts

Net margin

-48.4%+271.7% pts

FCF margin

45.5%-33.1% pts
MetricTTM
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$195.9M$195.9M$203.3M
Net Income$-94.7M$-94.7M$-650.7M
EBITDA$133.2M$133.2M$-166.4M
EPS-0.01-0.01-0.07
Gross Margin42.5%42.5%41.5%
Operating Margin15.3%15.3%7.3%
Net Margin-48.4%-48.4%-320.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-5.63-5.63-9.12
Current Ratio0.100.10—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$89.2M$89.2M$159.9M
Returns
ROE39.2%39.2%401.6%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA26.2726.27—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-3.6%-3.6%—
EPS Growth85.4%85.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -18.3%

Total return

-18.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.07 → -0.01

Residual

-18.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-18.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.