StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1140.HK$0.16-0.61%
Fair $0.16+0.0%

1140.HK

HK.AI Capital Limited

Financial Services / Asset ManagementHKSE

$0.16

-0.00 (-0.61%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.16Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 41/C
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 4.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 5/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

41/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 0.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 1140.HKLocal privado en este navegador · HK.AI Capital Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.9B

P/E

16.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

0.6%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.07

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

1140.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.162Periodo -70.0%
Fair value: $0.162

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-20.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-20.0%

FCF / Net income

-0.34x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $108.4M · net income $64.2M · FCF $-21.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

59.2%-42.7% pts

FCF margin

-20.0%-3.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$108.4M$108.4M$-18.8M$151.1M$217.2M
Net Income$64.2M$64.2M$53.7M$146.4M$221.3M
EPS0.010.010.010.020.06
Net Margin59.2%59.2%-285.1%96.9%101.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.070.070.140.130.34
Current Ratio6.766.76———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-21.7M$-21.7M$-49.5M$-100.0M$-36.0M
Returns
ROE0.6%0.6%0.5%1.5%4.0%
Valuation
P/E16.2016.2024.5118.619.50
P/B0.170.170.130.270.35
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth676.1%676.1%-112.5%-30.4%—
EPS Growth19.6%19.6%-71.7%-70.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

33.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.01

Spread vs growth

-13.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

23.3%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

-3.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

16.5%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

3.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +105.1%

Total return

+105.1%

Start / end P/E

15.5x → 26.6x

EPS bridge

0.01 → 0.01

Residual

+14.0%

EPS growth+19.6%
Multiple rerating+71.4%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+14.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.