StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
1543.HK$0.19+5.03%
Fair $0.19+0.0%

1543.HK

Guangdong Join-Share Financing Guarantee Investment Co., Ltd.

Financial Services / Credit ServicesHKSE

$0.19

+0.01 (+5.03%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.19Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 31/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 8.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 3/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

31/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 0.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 1543.HKLocal privado en este navegador · Guangdong Join-Share Financing Guarantee Investment Co., Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$293M

P/E

18.8x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

0.5%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.42

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

1543.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.188Periodo -86.4%
Fair value: $0.188

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-8.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

30.4%

FCF / Net income

8.15x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $277.8M · net income $10.4M · FCF $84.6M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

3.7%-8.1% pts

FCF margin

30.4%+43.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$277.8M$277.8M$354.7M$336.0M$359.7M
Net Income$10.4M$10.4M$42.2M$38.4M$42.6M
EPS——0.030.020.03
Net Margin3.7%3.7%11.9%11.4%11.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.420.420.440.390.34
Current Ratio7.207.20———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$84.6M$84.6M$-315.7M$-41.4M$-46.0M
Returns
ROE0.5%0.5%2.1%1.9%2.1%
Valuation
P/E18.8018.8013.3339.5055.00
P/B0.150.150.310.611.25
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-21.7%-21.7%5.6%-6.6%—
EPS Growth——50.0%-33.3%—
Dividend Yield11.6%11.6%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -18.8%

Total return

-18.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.03 → n/d

Residual

-30.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+11.6%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-30.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.