StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5021.KL$0.23+0.00%
Fair $0.23+0.0%

5021.KL

AYS Ventures Berhad

Basic Materials / SteelKuala Lumpur

$0.23

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.23Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $41.6M · quality 43.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 33/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is 1.4%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 5021.KLLocal privado en este navegador · AYS Ventures Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$94M

P/E

22.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

28.3x

↑

ROE

1.4%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.87

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5021.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.225Periodo -97.9%
Fair value: $0.225

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-6.4%

FCF CAGR

+113.0%

FCF margin

3.9%

FCF / Net income

6.67x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.08B · net income $6.2M · FCF $41.6M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

0.4%-5.8% pts

Net margin

0.6%-2.5% pts

FCF margin

3.9%+3.5% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.08B$1.08B$1.32B$1.29B$1.31B
Net Income$6.2M$6.2M$-4.5M$18.8M$40.1M
EBITDA$16.5M$16.5M$12.5M$58.8M$80.9M
EPS——-0.010.040.10
Gross Margin——6.7%9.7%11.2%
Operating Margin0.4%0.4%0.3%4.3%6.1%
Net Margin0.6%0.6%-0.3%1.5%3.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.870.870.971.031.05
Current Ratio1.411.41———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$41.6M$41.6M$75.8M$5.1M$4.3M
Returns
ROE1.4%1.4%-1.0%4.1%9.0%
Valuation
P/E22.5022.50—9.504.00
EV/EBITDA28.2928.2938.7210.327.56
P/B0.200.200.230.350.38
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-18.6%-18.6%2.5%-1.9%—
EPS Growth——-127.0%-60.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -6.3%

Total return

-6.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → n/d

Residual

-6.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-6.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.