StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5230.KL$0.29+1.72%
Fair $0.29+0.0%

5230.KL

Tune Protect Group Berhad

Financial Services / Insurance - DiversifiedKuala Lumpur

$0.29

+0.00 (+1.72%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.29Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 40/C
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 7/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

40/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 4.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 5230.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Tune Protect Group Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$222M

P/E

9.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

4.8%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5230.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.295Periodo -78.9%
Fair value: $0.295

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-6.0%

FCF / Net income

-0.78x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $345.3M · net income $26.5M · FCF $-20.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

7.7%+19.4% pts

FCF margin

-6.0%-16.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$345.3M$345.3M$364.9M$316.4M$299.5M
Net Income$26.5M$26.5M$572000.00$-947000.00$-35.1M
EPS0.040.040.00-0.00-0.05
Net Margin7.7%7.7%0.2%-0.3%-11.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.010.010.01
Current Ratio5.765.76———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-20.7M$-20.7M$-17.0M$27.4M$30.0M
Returns
ROE4.8%4.8%0.1%-0.2%-6.7%
Valuation
P/E9.839.83400.00——
P/B0.400.400.460.580.50
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-5.4%-5.4%15.3%5.7%—
EPS Growth4287.5%4287.5%161.5%97.2%—
Dividend Yield4.4%4.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-9.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

4296.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-2.0%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

4289.5%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

3.8%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.05

Spread vs growth

4283.7%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +7.9%

Total return

+7.9%

Start / end P/E

356.2x → 8.4x

EPS bridge

0.00 → 0.04

Residual

-4186.4%

EPS growth+4287.5%
Multiple rerating-97.6%
Dividend+4.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-4186.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.