StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5842.T$3350.00-2.03%
Fair $3350.00+0.0%

5842.T

Integral Corporation

Financial Services / Asset ManagementTokyo

$3350.00

-70.00 (-2.03%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3350.00Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 53/C
F-Score: 1/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 59.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

53/100

C

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 5842.TLocal privado en este navegador · Integral Corporation
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$114.1B

P/E

19.4x

↑

EV/EBITDA

9.9x

↓

ROE

9.7%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.06

↓
52-Week Range$3350
$2650$4395

TradingView lightweight chart

5842.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3,375Periodo +36.4%
Fair value: $3,350

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+32.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-15.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.24x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $9.33B · net income $6.08B · FCF $-1.46B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

99.1%+24.8% pts

Net margin

65.1%+15.0% pts

FCF margin

-15.7%-25.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$9.33B$9.33B$21.82B$8.29B$4.04B
Net Income$6.08B$6.08B$18.11B$7.57B$2.02B
EBITDA$9.91B$9.91B$26.45B$11.19B$3.19B
EPS——510.65243.9368.48
Operating Margin99.1%99.1%119.2%132.6%74.3%
Net Margin65.1%65.1%83.0%91.3%50.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.060.060.060.130.36
Current Ratio2.242.24———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-1.46B$-1.46B$5.81B$5.62B$382.4M
Returns
ROE9.7%9.7%31.4%19.0%10.4%
Valuation
P/E19.4219.428.5410.70—
EV/EBITDA9.949.945.146.02—
P/B1.831.832.682.03—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-57.2%-57.2%163.2%105.5%—
EPS Growth——109.3%256.2%—
Dividend Yield1.1%1.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +24.5%

Total return

+24.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

510.65 → n/d

Residual

+23.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+23.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.