StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
5MD.SI$0.28-1.75%
Fair $0.28+0.0%

5MD.SI

Soon Lian Holdings Limited

Basic Materials / AluminumSES

$0.28

-0.00 (-1.75%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.28Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 51/C
F-Score: 1/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $5.3M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 7/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

51/100

C

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists.
Thesis & Journal · 5MD.SILocal privado en este navegador · Soon Lian Holdings Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$30M

P/E

7.0x

↓

EV/EBITDA

3.3x

↓

ROE

10.0%

↑

Gross Margin

15.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

5MD.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.280Periodo +27.3%
Fair value: $0.280

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-3.6%

FCF / Net income

-0.59x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $78.0M · net income $4.8M · FCF $-2.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

15.2%-10.4% pts

Operating margin

8.1%-6.6% pts

Net margin

6.1%-4.5% pts

FCF margin

-3.6%+11.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$78.0M$78.0M$70.9M$57.7M$70.8M
Net Income$4.8M$4.8M$5.8M$-4.5M$7.6M
EBITDA$8.4M$8.4M$9.0M$-1.7M$11.3M
EPS——0.05-0.040.07
Gross Margin15.2%15.2%20.5%5.8%25.6%
Operating Margin8.1%8.1%10.8%-4.6%14.7%
Net Margin6.1%6.1%8.2%-7.8%10.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.160.280.23
Current Ratio2.342.34———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.8M$-2.8M$5.3M$15.4M$-10.4M
Returns
ROE10.0%10.0%13.3%-12.0%17.7%
Valuation
P/E7.007.003.56—2.50
EV/EBITDA3.353.351.95—2.10
P/B0.630.630.470.570.44
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.0%10.0%22.8%-18.4%—
EPS Growth——227.6%-160.0%—
Dividend Yield1.4%1.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +90.6%

Total return

+90.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.05 → n/d

Residual

+89.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+1.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+89.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.