StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
6378.KL$0.45+0.00%
Fair $0.45+0.0%

6378.KL

BEDI Berhad

Basic Materials / Building MaterialsKuala Lumpur

$0.45

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.45Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 32/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $41.9M · quality 68.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 66/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

32/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is 3.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 6378.KLLocal privado en este navegador · BEDI Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$390M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

19.3x

↑

ROE

3.5%

↑

Gross Margin

28.9%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.70

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

6378.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.450Periodo -72.0%
Fair value: $0.450

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2026 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-1.1%

FCF CAGR

+2.2%

FCF margin

54.5%

FCF / Net income

5.82x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $74.8M · net income $7.0M · FCF $40.8M

2022-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

28.9%-2.9% pts

Operating margin

11.8%-0.0% pts

Net margin

9.4%+13.4% pts

FCF margin

54.5%+6.6% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$74.8M$74.8M$162.2M$122.8M$78.0M
Net Income$7.0M$7.0M$25.5M$-2.1M$-3.2M
EBITDA$23.6M$23.6M$52.0M$18.1M$16.5M
EPS———-0.01-0.02
Gross Margin28.9%28.9%37.6%23.2%31.8%
Operating Margin11.8%11.8%27.5%10.0%11.8%
Net Margin9.4%9.4%15.7%-1.7%-4.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.700.700.801.201.34
Current Ratio1.051.05———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$40.8M$40.8M$78.3M$41.9M$37.4M
Returns
ROE3.5%3.5%13.2%-1.2%-1.9%
Valuation
EV/EBITDA19.3019.309.3015.0917.88
P/B1.961.961.950.520.46
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-53.9%-53.9%32.2%57.3%—
EPS Growth———8.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +26.8%

Total return

+26.8%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → n/d

Residual

+26.8%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+26.8%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.