StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7123.KL$0.04+16.67%
Fair $0.04+0.0%

7123.KL

Maxland Berhad

Basic Materials / Lumber & Wood ProductionKuala Lumpur

$0.04

+0.01 (+16.67%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.04Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 24/D
F-Score: 1/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-12.9M · quality 80.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 45/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

24/100

D

Piotroski

1/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -20.5%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 7123.KLLocal privado en este navegador · Maxland Berhad
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$56M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-20.5%

↓

Gross Margin

-27.9%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.11

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

7123.KL price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.035Periodo -99.7%
Fair value: $0.035

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-25.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-23.4%

FCF / Net income

0.39x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $54.4M · net income $-32.9M · FCF $-12.7M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

-27.9%-43.6% pts

Operating margin

-65.8%-73.7% pts

Net margin

-60.6%-73.9% pts

FCF margin

-23.4%+2.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$54.4M$54.4M—$49.6M$129.4M
Net Income$-32.9M$-32.9M—$-2.5M$17.2M
EBITDA$-12.8M$-12.8M—$9.7M$43.2M
EPS-0.02-0.02—-0.000.01
Gross Margin-27.9%-27.9%—-29.1%15.7%
Operating Margin-65.8%-65.8%—-55.7%7.9%
Net Margin-60.6%-60.6%—-5.1%13.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.110.110.090.070.07
Current Ratio0.620.62———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-12.7M$-12.7M—$-13.1M$-33.7M
Returns
ROE-20.5%-20.5%—-1.0%7.2%
Valuation
P/E————8.72
EV/EBITDA———20.693.63
P/B0.350.350.750.770.63
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth———-61.6%—
EPS Growth———-111.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -22.2%

Total return

-22.2%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

n/d → -0.02

Residual

-22.2%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-22.2%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.