StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7150.T$470.00-2.89%
Fair $470.00+0.0%

7150.T

The Shimane Bank,Ltd.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalTokyo

$470.00

-14.00 (-2.89%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $470.00Fund rank 19/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 6/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 9.0/100

Data gap 19/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 4.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 7150.TLocal privado en este navegador · The Shimane Bank,Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$3.9B

P/E

27.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

4.1%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.34

↑
52-Week Range$470
$450$720

TradingView lightweight chart

7150.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $470.00Periodo -34.4%
Fair value: $470.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.8%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

206.9%

FCF / Net income

29.50x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $8.68B · net income $609.0M · FCF $17.96B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

7.0%+2.9% pts

FCF margin

206.9%+478.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$8.68B$8.68B$7.83B$6.94B$7.12B
Net Income$609.0M$609.0M$419.0M$418.0M$294.0M
EPS27.4527.4520.5231.2329.92
Net Margin7.0%7.0%5.4%6.0%4.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.341.340.970.782.52
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$17.96B$17.96B$6.11B$-27.92B$-19.36B
Returns
ROE4.1%4.1%2.2%2.5%2.1%
Valuation
P/E27.5527.5526.9015.3417.18
P/B0.260.260.240.230.36
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth10.9%10.9%12.7%-2.5%—
EPS Growth33.8%33.8%-34.3%4.4%—
Dividend Yield2.1%2.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

15.0%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$41.70

Spread vs growth

18.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

12.9%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$50.46

Spread vs growth

20.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

11.5%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$81.27

Spread vs growth

22.3%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +4.8%

Total return

+4.8%

Start / end P/E

22.3x → 17.1x

EPS bridge

20.52 → 27.45

Residual

-7.9%

EPS growth+33.8%
Multiple rerating-23.3%
Dividend+2.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-7.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.