StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7738.TWO$171.00-1.72%
Fair $171.00+0.0%

7738.TWO

7738.TWO

Financial Services / Capital MarketsTaipei Exchange

$171.00

-3.00 (-1.72%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $171.00Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 60/B
F-Score: 5/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 57.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

60/100

B

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7738.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7738.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$4.7B

P/E

11.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

6.2x

↓

ROE

18.4%

↑

Gross Margin

55.1%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$171
$156$262

TradingView lightweight chart

7738.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $171.00Periodo -15.3%
Fair value: $171.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+51.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

61.1%

FCF / Net income

0.93x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $565.1M · net income $371.1M · FCF $345.2M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

55.1%+25.6% pts

Operating margin

85.7%+65.8% pts

Net margin

65.7%+53.4% pts

FCF margin

61.1%+93.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$565.1M$565.1M$434.2M$340.7M$163.8M
Net Income$371.1M$371.1M$233.6M$60.4M$20.2M
EBITDA$497.7M$497.7M$324.2M$108.4M$36.2M
EPS——9.472.991.01
Gross Margin55.1%55.1%49.0%42.6%29.5%
Operating Margin85.7%85.7%74.2%30.7%19.9%
Net Margin65.7%65.7%53.8%17.7%12.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.130.280.43
Current Ratio12.1012.10———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$345.2M$345.2M$214.2M$69.6M$-52.3M
Returns
ROE18.4%18.4%18.4%9.9%5.2%
Valuation
P/E11.7311.7315.84——
EV/EBITDA6.226.228.70——
P/B2.322.322.92——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth30.2%30.2%27.4%108.0%—
EPS Growth——216.7%196.0%—
Dividend Yield2.7%2.7%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +7.6%

Total return

+7.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

9.47 → n/d

Residual

+4.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+2.7%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+4.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.