StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
7752.TWO$35.75+15.44%
Fair $35.75+0.0%

7752.TWO

7752.TWO

Utilities / Utilities - RenewableTaipei Exchange

$35.75

+4.30 (+15.44%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $35.75Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-753.4M · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); composite fair value and forward targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · 7752.TWOLocal privado en este navegador · 7752.TWO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$7.1B

P/E

16.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

8.4x

↓

ROE

7.9%

↑

Gross Margin

14.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.47

↓
52-Week Range$36
$26$111

TradingView lightweight chart

7752.TWO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $32.15Periodo -76.6%
Fair value: $35.75

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+199.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

13.2%

FCF / Net income

1.01x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $3.37B · net income $442.7M · FCF $445.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

14.2%+26.4% pts

Operating margin

11.1%+74.2% pts

Net margin

13.2%+93.4% pts

FCF margin

13.2%+972.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$3.37B$3.37B$782.1M$475.7M$125.6M
Net Income$442.7M$442.7M$21.4M$7.3M$-100.8M
EBITDA$858.8M$858.8M$238.1M$163.3M$-52.3M
EPS——0.120.05-0.71
Gross Margin14.2%14.2%8.4%18.6%-12.3%
Operating Margin11.1%11.1%-1.7%7.0%-63.1%
Net Margin13.2%13.2%2.7%1.5%-80.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.470.470.410.700.33
Current Ratio1.551.55———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$445.9M$445.9M$-753.4M$-1.42B$-1.20B
Returns
ROE7.9%7.9%0.4%0.3%-3.7%
Valuation
P/E16.0316.03858.33——
EV/EBITDA8.378.3781.84——
P/B1.261.263.51——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth330.4%330.4%64.4%278.8%—
EPS Growth——140.0%107.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -67.3%

Total return

-67.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.12 → n/d

Residual

-67.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-67.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.