StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8163.HK$0.03+13.33%
Fair $0.03+0.0%

8163.HK

NOIZ Group Limited

Financial Services / Financial ConglomeratesHKSE

$0.03

+0.00 (+13.33%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.03Fund rank 28/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 20/D
F-Score: 6/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 62.0/100

Data gap 28/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 21/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

20/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -42.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8163.HKLocal privado en este navegador · NOIZ Group Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$35M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-42.8%

↓

Gross Margin

100.0%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.05

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

8163.HK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.034Periodo -100.0%
Fair value: $0.034

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.2%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

8.8%

FCF / Net income

-0.15x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $20.5M · net income $-12.1M · FCF $1.8M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

100.0%— pts

Operating margin

-33.3%+51.5% pts

Net margin

-58.9%+94.4% pts

FCF margin

8.8%+40.6% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$20.5M$20.5M$20.6M$18.9M$18.2M
Net Income$-12.1M$-12.1M$-27.3M$-25.7M$-27.8M
EBITDA$-8.8M$-8.8M$-9.8M$-6.7M$-10.7M
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.05-0.04-0.05
Gross Margin100.0%100.0%———
Operating Margin-33.3%-33.3%-98.5%-70.4%-84.7%
Net Margin-58.9%-58.9%-132.5%-135.6%-153.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.050.050.15-2.33-3.18
Current Ratio3.353.35———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.8M$1.8M$-11.8M$-8.8M$-5.8M
Returns
ROE-42.8%-42.8%-130.1%73.8%96.1%
Valuation
P/B0.920.923.75——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-0.3%-0.3%8.6%4.3%—
EPS Growth62.7%62.7%-2.5%17.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -69.1%

Total return

-69.1%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.05 → -0.02

Residual

-69.1%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-69.1%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.