StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8343.T$5800.00-3.01%
Fair $5800.00+0.0%

8343.T

The Akita Bank, Ltd.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalTokyo

$5800.00

-180.00 (-3.01%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $5800.00Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 48/C
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 10.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

48/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8343.TLocal privado en este navegador · The Akita Bank, Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$103.2B

P/E

13.4x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

3.6%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.56

↑
52-Week Range$5800
$2865$6330

TradingView lightweight chart

8343.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $5,810Periodo +40.7%
Fair value: $5,800

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+8.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-280.7%

FCF / Net income

-23.28x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $46.96B · net income $5.66B · FCF $-131.80B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

12.1%+3.5% pts

FCF margin

-280.7%-820.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$46.96B$46.96B$38.67B$43.27B$37.26B
Net Income$5.66B$5.66B$4.54B$3.29B$3.18B
EPS320.37320.37258.15185.35—
Net Margin12.1%12.1%11.7%7.6%8.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.560.561.221.311.73
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-131.80B$-131.80B$-53.74B$-168.20B$201.26B
Returns
ROE3.6%3.6%2.6%2.2%1.9%
Valuation
P/E13.4013.407.899.41—
P/B0.660.660.210.210.17
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth21.4%21.4%-10.6%16.1%—
EPS Growth24.1%24.1%39.3%——
Dividend Yield3.4%3.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

17.1%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$514.65

Spread vs growth

7.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

14.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$622.73

Spread vs growth

9.9%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

12.1%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$1002.91

Spread vs growth

12.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +102.8%

Total return

+102.8%

Start / end P/E

11.3x → 18.1x

EPS bridge

258.15 → 320.37

Residual

+14.6%

EPS growth+24.1%
Multiple rerating+60.6%
Dividend+3.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+14.6%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.