StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8346.T$728.00-3.19%
Fair $728.00+0.0%

8346.T

The Toho Bank, Ltd.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalTokyo

$728.00

-24.00 (-3.19%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $728.00Fund rank 21/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 40/C
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 12.0/100

Data gap 21/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

40/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8346.TLocal privado en este navegador · The Toho Bank, Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$181.9B

P/E

15.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

3.8%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.13

↑
52-Week Range$728
$319$796

TradingView lightweight chart

8346.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $728.00Periodo +78.0%
Fair value: $728.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+2.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-355.2%

FCF / Net income

-28.45x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $59.63B · net income $7.45B · FCF $-211.83B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

12.5%+0.2% pts

FCF margin

-355.2%-1260.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$59.63B$59.63B$53.46B$52.91B$54.78B
Net Income$7.45B$7.45B$5.25B$4.49B$6.75B
EPS29.7829.7820.8217.8226.79
Net Margin12.5%12.5%9.8%8.5%12.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.131.130.960.963.58
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-211.83B$-211.83B$109.32B$-768.00B$496.03B
Returns
ROE3.8%3.8%2.5%2.4%3.5%
Valuation
P/E15.2215.2216.2312.077.50
P/B0.920.920.410.280.26
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11.5%11.5%1.0%-3.4%—
EPS Growth43.0%43.0%16.8%-33.5%—
Dividend Yield2.9%2.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

29.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$64.60

Spread vs growth

13.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

21.3%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$78.16

Spread vs growth

21.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

15.5%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$125.88

Spread vs growth

27.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +118.9%

Total return

+118.9%

Start / end P/E

16.2x → 24.4x

EPS bridge

20.82 → 29.78

Residual

+22.0%

EPS growth+43.0%
Multiple rerating+51.0%
Dividend+2.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+22.0%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.