StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8367.T$1632.00-1.27%
Fair $1632.00+0.0%

8367.T

The Nanto Bank, Ltd.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalTokyo

$1632.00

-21.00 (-1.27%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1632.00Fund rank 21/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 44/C
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 16.0/100

Data gap 21/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

44/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 4.9%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8367.TLocal privado en este navegador · The Nanto Bank, Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$256.3B

P/E

15.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

4.9%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.10

↑
52-Week Range$1632
$784$1791

TradingView lightweight chart

8367.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,632Periodo +126.7%
Fair value: $1,632

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.1%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-235.3%

FCF / Net income

-13.30x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $76.35B · net income $13.51B · FCF $-179.64B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

17.7%-0.8% pts

FCF margin

-235.3%-805.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$76.35B$76.35B$62.33B$60.68B$64.00B
Net Income$13.51B$13.51B$12.04B$4.73B$11.87B
EPS85.8085.8075.8229.55—
Net Margin17.7%17.7%19.3%7.8%18.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.101.101.201.373.11
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-179.64B$-179.64B$-30.98B$-520.15B$364.62B
Returns
ROE4.9%4.9%4.0%1.8%4.1%
Valuation
P/E15.0315.037.7815.87—
P/B0.930.930.310.290.22
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth22.5%22.5%2.7%-5.2%—
EPS Growth13.2%13.2%156.6%——
Dividend Yield3.4%3.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

19.1%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$144.81

Spread vs growth

-5.9%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

15.3%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$175.22

Spread vs growth

-2.2%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

12.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$282.20

Spread vs growth

0.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +106.4%

Total return

+106.4%

Start / end P/E

10.6x → 19.0x

EPS bridge

75.82 → 85.80

Residual

+10.5%

EPS growth+13.2%
Multiple rerating+79.4%
Dividend+3.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+10.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.