StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8383.T$1447.00-2.17%
Fair $1447.00+0.0%

8383.T

The Tottori Bank, Ltd.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalTokyo

$1447.00

-32.00 (-2.17%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1447.00Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 9.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 2.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8383.TLocal privado en este navegador · The Tottori Bank, Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$13.5B

P/E

8.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

2.7%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.50

↑
52-Week Range$1447
$1237$2042

TradingView lightweight chart

8383.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,446Periodo -59.8%
Fair value: $1,447

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-273.8%

FCF / Net income

-28.94x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $13.88B · net income $1.31B · FCF $-37.99B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

9.5%+1.7% pts

FCF margin

-273.8%-373.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$13.88B$13.88B$12.93B$12.15B$11.49B
Net Income$1.31B$1.31B$1.06B$1.04B$891.0M
EPS140.28140.28112.83111.5795.18
Net Margin9.5%9.5%8.2%8.6%7.8%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.500.500.840.881.31
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-37.99B$-37.99B$55.72B$-38.59B$11.43B
Returns
ROE2.7%2.7%2.1%2.2%1.8%
Valuation
P/E8.558.5512.5110.2012.04
P/B0.280.280.260.220.22
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth7.3%7.3%6.4%5.8%—
EPS Growth24.3%24.3%1.1%17.2%—
Dividend Yield3.5%3.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-2.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$128.40

Spread vs growth

27.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

2.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$155.36

Spread vs growth

22.3%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

6.0%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$250.21

Spread vs growth

18.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +18.0%

Total return

+18.0%

Start / end P/E

11.2x → 10.3x

EPS bridge

112.83 → 140.28

Residual

-1.9%

EPS growth+24.3%
Multiple rerating-7.8%
Dividend+3.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.