StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8541.T$1930.00-0.92%
Fair $1930.00+0.0%

8541.T

The Ehime Bank, Ltd.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalTokyo

$1930.00

-18.00 (-0.92%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1930.00Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 6/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 17.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 27/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 4.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8541.TLocal privado en este navegador · The Ehime Bank, Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$75.4B

P/E

10.5x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

4.2%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.52

↑
52-Week Range$1930
$990$2040

TradingView lightweight chart

8541.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,930Periodo -17.3%
Fair value: $1,930

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.3%

FCF CAGR

-19.8%

FCF margin

97.0%

FCF / Net income

7.44x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $43.84B · net income $5.71B · FCF $42.52B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

13.0%-3.3% pts

FCF margin

97.0%-135.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$43.84B$43.84B$43.09B$38.18B$35.45B
Net Income$5.71B$5.71B$5.05B$5.39B$5.78B
EPS146.47146.47129.38137.96147.97
Net Margin13.0%13.0%11.7%14.1%16.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.520.520.530.750.95
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$42.52B$42.52B$-28.30B$-76.84B$82.33B
Returns
ROE4.2%4.2%3.7%4.2%4.3%
Valuation
P/E10.4510.458.396.135.80
P/B0.560.560.310.260.25
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.7%1.7%12.9%7.7%—
EPS Growth13.2%13.2%-6.2%-6.8%—
Dividend Yield2.5%2.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

5.3%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$171.26

Spread vs growth

7.9%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

7.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$207.22

Spread vs growth

6.0%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

8.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$333.73

Spread vs growth

4.6%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +95.1%

Total return

+95.1%

Start / end P/E

7.7x → 13.2x

EPS bridge

129.38 → 146.47

Residual

+9.3%

EPS growth+13.2%
Multiple rerating+70.1%
Dividend+2.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+9.3%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.