StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8542.T$1414.00-0.49%
Fair $1414.00+0.0%

8542.T

Tomato Bank, Ltd.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalTokyo

$1414.00

-7.00 (-0.49%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1414.00Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 6/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 13.0/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 37/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8542.TLocal privado en este navegador · Tomato Bank, Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$16.3B

P/E

15.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

3.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.72

↑
52-Week Range$1414
$1172$1876

TradingView lightweight chart

8542.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,414Periodo -59.3%
Fair value: $1,414

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+3.3%

FCF CAGR

-55.2%

FCF margin

36.4%

FCF / Net income

4.45x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $22.21B · net income $1.82B · FCF $8.09B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

8.2%-0.1% pts

FCF margin

36.4%-411.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$22.21B$22.21B$21.30B$20.29B$20.14B
Net Income$1.82B$1.82B$1.53B$1.88B$1.66B
EPS92.4292.4274.0989.9788.52
Net Margin8.2%8.2%7.2%9.3%8.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.720.720.690.472.20
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$8.09B$8.09B$6.32B$-110.62B$90.10B
Returns
ROE3.3%3.3%2.7%3.5%3.0%
Valuation
P/E15.5515.5516.5311.2911.55
P/B0.290.290.250.220.21
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.3%4.3%5.0%0.7%—
EPS Growth24.7%24.7%-17.7%1.6%—
Dividend Yield3.5%3.5%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

10.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$125.47

Spread vs growth

14.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

10.4%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$151.82

Spread vs growth

14.3%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

10.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$244.50

Spread vs growth

14.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +22.6%

Total return

+22.6%

Start / end P/E

16.0x → 15.3x

EPS bridge

74.09 → 92.42

Residual

-1.1%

EPS growth+24.7%
Multiple rerating-4.5%
Dividend+3.5%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1.1%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.