StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
8713.T$1931.00-1.75%
Fair $1931.00+0.0%

8713.T

FIDEA Holdings Co. Ltd.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalTokyo

$1931.00

-34.00 (-1.75%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1931.00Fund rank 19/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 14.0/100

Data gap 19/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 3.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · 8713.TLocal privado en este navegador · FIDEA Holdings Co. Ltd.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$34.9B

P/E

8.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

3.6%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.34

↑
52-Week Range$1931
$1418$2296

TradingView lightweight chart

8713.T price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,910Periodo -53.8%
Fair value: $1,931

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-0.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-331.5%

FCF / Net income

-54.30x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $46.12B · net income $2.82B · FCF $-152.90B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

6.1%-1.3% pts

FCF margin

-331.5%-508.9% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$46.12B$46.12B$45.65B$47.52B$47.36B
Net Income$2.82B$2.82B$1.18B$3.27B$3.51B
EPS156.21156.2165.20179.19148.59
Net Margin6.1%6.1%2.6%6.9%7.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.341.341.021.283.16
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-152.90B$-152.90B$66.03B$-405.49B$83.99B
Returns
ROE3.6%3.6%1.4%3.6%3.2%
Valuation
P/E8.448.4423.567.428.57
P/B0.450.450.320.270.21
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth1.0%1.0%-3.9%0.3%—
EPS Growth139.6%139.6%-63.6%20.6%—
Dividend Yield3.9%3.9%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

3.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$171.34

Spread vs growth

136.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

5.8%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$207.33

Spread vs growth

133.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

7.9%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$333.90

Spread vs growth

131.7%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +36.5%

Total return

+36.5%

Start / end P/E

22.1x → 12.2x

EPS bridge

65.20 → 156.21

Residual

-62.4%

EPS growth+139.6%
Multiple rerating-44.7%
Dividend+3.9%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-62.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.