StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ABG.JO$23050.00+1.08%
Fair $23050.00+0.0%

ABG.JO

Absa Group Limited

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalJohannesburg

$23050.00

+247.00 (+1.08%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $23050.00Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 54.0/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 84/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · ABG.JOLocal privado en este navegador · Absa Group Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$191.0B

P/E

8.7x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

12.7%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

1.40

↑
52-Week Range$23050
$15300$27812

TradingView lightweight chart

ABG.JO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $23,193Periodo +732.8%
Fair value: $23,050

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+6.0%

FCF CAGR

+35.8%

FCF margin

37.2%

FCF / Net income

1.84x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $115.23B · net income $23.27B · FCF $42.85B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

20.2%-1.4% pts

FCF margin

37.2%+19.5% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$115.23B$115.23B$109.74B$104.62B$96.83B
Net Income$23.27B$23.27B$22.64B$20.79B$20.87B
EPS26.5226.5225.9523.9324.30
Net Margin20.2%20.2%20.6%19.9%21.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.401.401.381.501.66
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$42.85B$42.85B$53.41B$37.74B$17.13B
Returns
ROE12.7%12.7%13.3%13.6%14.7%
Valuation
P/E8.748.74736.59660.34800.71
P/B106.47106.4793.4085.93114.23
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth5.0%5.0%4.9%8.0%—
EPS Growth2.2%2.2%8.4%-1.5%—
Dividend Yield7.4%7.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

325.7%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$2045.30

Spread vs growth

-323.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

147.7%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$2474.82

Spread vs growth

-145.6%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

65.1%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$3985.72

Spread vs growth

-62.9%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +42.2%

Total return

+42.2%

Start / end P/E

663.1x → 874.7x

EPS bridge

25.95 → 26.52

Residual

+0.7%

EPS growth+2.2%
Multiple rerating+31.9%
Dividend+7.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.7%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.