StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ALFLO.PA$0.65-3.70%
Fair $0.65+0.0%

ALFLO.PA

SAS Florentaise

Basic Materials / Agricultural InputsParis

$0.65

-0.03 (-3.70%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.65Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 29/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 19%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-5.3M · quality 48.3/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 28/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

29/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -0.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ALFLO.PALocal privado en este navegador · SAS Florentaise
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$5M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

4.4x

↓

ROE

-0.1%

↑

Gross Margin

47.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

1.39

↑
52-Week Range$1
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

ALFLO.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.650Periodo -93.0%
Fair value: $0.650

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2024 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.4%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.6%

FCF / Net income

144.19x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $66.7M · net income $-26000.0 · FCF $-3.7M

2021-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

47.8%+0.4% pts

Operating margin

4.2%+1.1% pts

Net margin

-0.0%-4.4% pts

FCF margin

-5.6%+0.6% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$66.7M$66.7M$53.9M$57.5M$58.6M
Net Income$-26000.00$-26000.00$562000.00$930000.00$2.5M
EBITDA$10.4M$10.4M$5.9M$7.4M$6.7M
EPS——0.090.160.44
Gross Margin47.8%47.8%47.1%49.0%47.4%
Operating Margin4.2%4.2%-0.8%5.4%3.1%
Net Margin-0.0%-0.0%1.0%1.6%4.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.391.391.252.492.87
Current Ratio0.750.75———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-3.7M$-3.7M$-7.1M$-5.3M$-3.7M
Returns
ROE-0.1%-0.1%1.7%5.6%22.8%
Valuation
P/E——91.11——
EV/EBITDA4.374.3715.34——
P/B0.160.161.56——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth23.6%23.6%-6.2%-1.9%—
EPS Growth——-45.5%-63.3%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -32.4%

Total return

-32.4%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.09 → n/d

Residual

-32.4%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-32.4%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.