StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ALIMTIAZ.KW$71.90+6.05%
Fair $71.90+0.0%

ALIMTIAZ.KW

Al Imtiaz Group Holding Co (K.S.C.P)

Financial Services / Asset ManagementKuwait

$71.90

+4.10 (+6.05%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $71.90Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 39/D
F-Score: 3/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 0.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

39/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific holding-company NAV/SOTP model required: targets are disabled until look-through holdings, debt and discount data exists. ROE is -86.2%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ALIMTIAZ.KWLocal privado en este navegador · Al Imtiaz Group Holding Co (K.S.C.P)
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$82M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-86.2%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.29

↓
52-Week Range$72
$30$80

TradingView lightweight chart

ALIMTIAZ.KW price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $71.90Periodo -60.9%
Fair value: $71.90

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-6.7%

FCF CAGR

+218.2%

FCF margin

19.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.16x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $58.4M · net income $-71.8M · FCF $11.5M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

-123.0%-116.8% pts

FCF margin

19.7%+19.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$58.4M$58.4M$68.4M$61.1M$71.8M
Net Income$-71.8M$-71.8M$-4.3M$-9.8M$-4.4M
EPS-0.07-0.07-0.00-0.01-0.00
Net Margin-123.0%-123.0%-6.2%-16.1%-6.1%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.290.290.190.210.20
Current Ratio1.161.16———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$11.5M$11.5M$3.8M$-2.6M$356681.00
Returns
ROE-86.2%-86.2%-2.9%-6.5%-2.7%
Valuation
P/B947.05947.05452.10421.42444.15
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-14.6%-14.6%11.9%-14.9%—
EPS Growth-1473.1%-1473.1%56.6%-123.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +139.7%

Total return

+139.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.00 → -0.07

Residual

+139.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+139.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.