StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ALVIN.PA$3.56+0.00%
Fair $3.56+0.0%

ALVIN.PA

Vinpai SAS

Basic Materials / Specialty ChemicalsParis

$3.56

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $3.56Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 30/D
F-Score: 2/9
Margin CompressionLow Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-3.1M · quality 66.3/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 46/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

30/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 2unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. Operating margin has declined for 3 consecutive years ROE is 2.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ALVIN.PALocal privado en este navegador · Vinpai SAS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$16M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

208.3%

↑

Gross Margin

7.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

-2.18

↓
52-Week Range$4
$3$4

TradingView lightweight chart

ALVIN.PA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $3.560Periodo -47.3%
Fair value: $3.560

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+18.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

—

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $10.2M · net income $-4.9M · FCF —

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

7.1%-9.2% pts

Operating margin

-46.4%-26.1% pts

Net margin

-47.6%-23.7% pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$10.2M$10.2M$9.2M$7.9M$6.2M
Net Income$-4.9M$-4.9M$-2.9M$-3.4M$-1.5M
EBITDA$-1.5M$-1.5M$-2.2M$-2.6M$-771034.00
EPS——-0.87-1.03-0.44
Gross Margin7.1%7.1%6.6%14.5%16.3%
Operating Margin-46.4%-46.4%-27.3%-22.0%-20.3%
Net Margin-47.6%-47.6%-31.9%-43.5%-23.9%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-2.18-2.18-16.352.1113.27
Current Ratio0.380.38———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow———$-3.1M$-321000.00
Returns
ROE208.3%208.3%643.1%-155.8%-342.0%
Valuation
P/B———8.25—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11.5%11.5%15.9%27.0%—
EPS Growth——15.0%-132.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +3.5%

Total return

+3.5%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.87 → n/d

Residual

+3.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+3.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.