StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AMGO.L$2.42-3.40%
Fair $2.42+0.0%

AMGO.L

Amigo Resources PLC

Basic Materials / GoldLSE

$2.42

-0.09 (-3.40%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.42Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 10/F
F-Score: 4/9
Declining Revenue

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 32% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $78.8M · quality 43.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 45/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

10/100

F

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. Revenue has declined for 2 consecutive years
Thesis & Journal · AMGO.LLocal privado en este navegador · Amigo Resources PLC
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$29M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

N/A

•

Gross Margin

-5.0%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$2
$0$4

TradingView lightweight chart

AMGO.L price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.415Periodo -99.2%
Fair value: $2.415

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2024 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-66.6%

FCF CAGR

-83.8%

FCF margin

54.0%

FCF / Net income

-0.43x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $10.0M · net income $-12.6M · FCF $5.4M

2022-FY → 2024-FY

Gross margin

-5.0%-74.5% pts

Operating margin

-199.0%-429.5% pts

Net margin

-126.0%-315.3% pts

FCF margin

54.0%-175.4% pts
MetricTTM
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$10.0M$10.0M$20.8M$89.6M
Net Income$-12.6M$-12.6M$-34.8M$169.6M
EBITDA$-19.6M$-19.6M$-37.4M$207.3M
EPS-0.03-0.03-0.070.36
Gross Margin-5.0%-5.0%6.7%69.5%
Operating Margin-199.0%-199.0%-183.7%230.5%
Net Margin-126.0%-126.0%-167.3%189.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.011.06
Current Ratio0.880.88——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$5.4M$5.4M$78.8M$205.5M
Returns
ROE——-276.2%354.1%
Valuation
P/E———12.76
EV/EBITDA———10.04
P/B——7.5545.20
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-51.9%-51.9%-76.8%—
EPS Growth63.0%63.0%-120.4%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +866.0%

Total return

+866.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.07 → -0.03

Residual

+866.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+866.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.