StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AMITSEC.BO$54.00+0.00%
Fair $54.00+0.0%

AMITSEC.BO

AMITSEC.BO

Basic Materials / AluminumBSE

$54.00

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $54.00Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 36/D
F-Score: 5/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-1.2M · quality 39.3/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 23/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

36/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is 4.6%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · AMITSEC.BOLocal privado en este navegador · AMITSEC.BO
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$383M

P/E

31.0x

↑

EV/EBITDA

154.1x

↑

ROE

4.6%

↑

Gross Margin

5.2%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$54
$9$67

TradingView lightweight chart

AMITSEC.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $54.00Periodo +641.8%
Fair value: $54.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-1.1%

FCF / Net income

-0.04x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $23.3M · net income $7.3M · FCF $-255000.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

5.2%+1.8% pts

Operating margin

0.7%+2.0% pts

Net margin

31.2%+18.6% pts

FCF margin

-1.1%+14.2% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$23.3M$23.3M$19.7M$22.2M$20.7M
Net Income$7.3M$7.3M$2.6M$23.4M$2.6M
EBITDA$2.5M$2.5M$2.0M$21.1M$1.1M
EPS1.021.020.363.290.35
Gross Margin5.2%5.2%4.9%3.3%3.4%
Operating Margin0.7%0.7%-0.4%-2.3%-1.3%
Net Margin31.2%31.2%13.0%105.4%12.6%
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-255000.00$-255000.00$-1.3M$-1.2M$-3.2M
Returns
ROE4.6%4.6%1.7%15.6%2.1%
Valuation
P/E31.0331.03———
EV/EBITDA154.12154.12———
P/B2.412.41———
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth18.1%18.1%-11.1%7.0%—
EPS Growth183.9%183.9%-89.1%840.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

67.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$4.79

Spread vs growth

116.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

41.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$5.80

Spread vs growth

142.4%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

24.8%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$9.34

Spread vs growth

159.1%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +518.6%

Total return

+518.6%

Start / end P/E

24.3x → 52.9x

EPS bridge

0.36 → 1.02

Residual

+216.8%

EPS growth+183.9%
Multiple rerating+117.9%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+216.8%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.