StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ANTA$7.74+0.52%
Fair $7.74+0.0%

ANTA

ANTA

Financial Services / Credit ServicesNasdaqGM

$7.74

+0.04 (+0.52%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $7.74Fund rank 18/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 5/9
High Debt

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 38.0/100

Data gap 18/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 15/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

12/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 3Warnings: 1unknown: 3
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Debt-to-Equity ratio is 8.61, above the 2.0 threshold
Thesis & Journal · ANTALocal privado en este navegador · ANTA
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$186M

P/E

9.4x

↓

EV/EBITDA

42.8x

↑

ROE

15.4%

↑

Gross Margin

49.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

8.61

↑
52-Week Range$8
$6$16

TradingView lightweight chart

ANTA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $7.740Periodo -39.5%
Fair value: $7.740

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2025 · 2 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+165.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.24x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $79.7M · net income $18.5M · FCF $-4.5M

2023-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

49.1%+5.0% pts

Operating margin

13.3%+79.2% pts

Net margin

23.2%+81.6% pts

FCF margin

-5.7%+103.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$79.7M$79.7M$47.5M$11.3M
Net Income$18.5M$18.5M$4.4M$-6.6M
EBITDA$28.4M$28.4M$5.8M$-7.4M
EPS0.750.750.19-0.29
Gross Margin49.1%49.1%48.1%44.1%
Operating Margin13.3%13.3%10.1%-65.9%
Net Margin23.2%23.2%9.3%-58.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity8.618.618.8427.26
Current Ratio1.141.14——
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-4.5M$-4.5M$-11.9M$-12.3M
Returns
ROE15.4%15.4%9.5%-51.8%
Valuation
P/E9.449.44——
EV/EBITDA42.7642.76——
P/B1.601.60——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth67.9%67.9%321.0%—
EPS Growth294.3%294.3%166.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-2.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.69

Spread vs growth

297.2%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

2.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.83

Spread vs growth

292.3%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

6.0%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$1.34

Spread vs growth

288.4%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -38.8%

Total return

-38.8%

Start / end P/E

66.5x → 10.3x

EPS bridge

0.19 → 0.75

Residual

-248.7%

EPS growth+294.3%
Multiple rerating-84.5%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-248.7%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.