StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ASHIS.BO$18.28+0.00%
Fair $18.28+0.0%

ASHIS.BO

Ashiana Ispat Limited

Basic Materials / SteelBSE

$18.28

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $18.28Fund rank 25/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 18/F
F-Score: 3/9
Declining Revenue

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-18.9M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 25/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 11/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

18/100

F

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. Revenue has declined for 2 consecutive years
Thesis & Journal · ASHIS.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Ashiana Ispat Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$146M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

587.3%

↑

Gross Margin

-3.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

-11.41

↓
52-Week Range$18
$17$30

TradingView lightweight chart

ASHIS.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $19.24Periodo -52.0%
Fair value: $18.28

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-31.4%

FCF CAGR

+15.0%

FCF margin

8.2%

FCF / Net income

-0.25x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.42B · net income $-466.9M · FCF $115.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

-3.8%-9.0% pts

Operating margin

-10.2%-12.1% pts

Net margin

-33.0%-33.2% pts

FCF margin

8.2%+6.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.42B$1.42B$3.22B$4.65B$4.39B
Net Income$-466.9M$-466.9M$14.7M$30.0M$10.1M
EBITDA$-443.7M$-443.7M$112.5M$124.8M$104.1M
EPS-58.57-58.571.853.761.27
Gross Margin-3.8%-3.8%7.1%5.5%5.2%
Operating Margin-10.2%-10.2%2.9%2.1%1.9%
Net Margin-33.0%-33.0%0.5%0.6%0.2%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity-11.41-11.412.622.462.49
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$115.4M$115.4M$-18.9M$-21.1M$75.8M
Returns
ROE587.3%587.3%3.8%8.1%3.0%
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-56.0%-56.0%-30.7%5.9%—
EPS Growth-3265.9%-3265.9%-50.8%196.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -21.3%

Total return

-21.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.85 → -58.57

Residual

-21.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-21.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.