StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
ASPI$8.01+2.96%
Fair $8.01+0.0%

ASPI

ASP Isotopes Inc.

Basic Materials / ChemicalsNasdaqCM

$8.01

+0.23 (+2.96%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $8.01Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 24/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 21%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-28.1M · quality 51.7/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 26/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

24/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 1unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -85.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · ASPILocal privado en este navegador · ASP Isotopes Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.0B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-85.8%

↓

Gross Margin

14.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

1.06

↑
52-Week Range$8
$4$14

TradingView lightweight chart

ASPI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $8.010Periodo +200.0%
Fair value: $8.010

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-198.9%

FCF / Net income

0.27x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $23.8M · net income $-175.1M · FCF $-47.4M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

14.3%— pts

Operating margin

-239.8%— pts

Net margin

-734.2%— pts

FCF margin

-198.9%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue$23.8M$23.8M$4.1M$433026.00——
Net Income$-175.1M$-175.1M$-32.3M$-16.3M$-4.9M—
EBITDA$-157.1M$-157.1M$-31.6M$-16.1M$-4.9M—
EPS-2.11-2.11-0.63-0.49-0.18—
Gross Margin14.3%14.3%38.6%32.1%——
Operating Margin-239.8%-239.8%-636.0%-3704.6%——
Net Margin-734.2%-734.2%-780.3%-3761.0%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity1.061.060.790.130.08—
Current Ratio4.394.39————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-47.4M$-47.4M$-28.1M$-7.7M$-7.4M—
Returns
ROE-85.8%-85.8%-67.5%-99.9%-50.4%—
Valuation
P/B3.263.266.243.554.91—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth475.5%475.5%857.0%———
EPS Growth-234.9%-234.9%-28.6%-172.2%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +6.0%

Total return

+6.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.63 → -2.11

Residual

+6.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+6.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.