StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AURE$2.51-0.55%
Fair $2.51+0.0%

AURE

Aurelion Inc.

Financial Services / Capital MarketsNasdaqCM

$2.51

-0.01 (-0.55%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2.51Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 25/D
F-Score: 3/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 17.0/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 13/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

25/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · AURELocal privado en este navegador · Aurelion Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$92M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

7793.3%

↑

Gross Margin

-130.1%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$3
$2$15

TradingView lightweight chart

AURE price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2.510Periodo -98.7%
Fair value: $2.510

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-5.0%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-129.6%

FCF / Net income

0.10x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.8M · net income $-22.7M · FCF $-2.3M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

-130.1%-230.1% pts

Operating margin

-710.5%-777.4% pts

Net margin

-1273.0%-1337.9% pts

FCF margin

-129.6%-185.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.8M$1.8M$263697.00$76338.00$2.1M
Net Income$-22.7M$-22.7M$-6.9M$-1.0M$1.4M
EBITDA$-12.6M$-12.6M$-5.8M$-512184.00$1.4M
EPS-4.43-4.43-6.76-1.251.51
Gross Margin-130.1%-130.1%100.0%100.0%100.0%
Operating Margin-710.5%-710.5%-2192.7%-686.7%66.9%
Net Margin-1273.0%-1273.0%-2607.9%-1356.8%65.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity———0.06—
Current Ratio59.9459.94———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-2.3M$-2.3M$-1.4M$-1.2M$1.2M
Returns
ROE7793.3%7793.3%-226.2%-16.8%25.2%
Valuation
P/B——2.714.27—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth577.1%577.1%245.4%-96.3%—
EPS Growth34.5%34.5%-440.8%-183.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -38.6%

Total return

-38.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-6.76 → -4.43

Residual

-38.6%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-38.6%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.