StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
AYUD-R.BK$39.75+0.00%
Fair $39.75+0.0%

AYUD-R.BK

Allianz Ayudhya Capital Public Company Limited

Financial Services / Insurance - Property & CasualtyThailand

$39.75

+0.00 (+0.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $39.75Fund rank 26/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 45/C
F-Score: 4/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 53.0/100

Data gap 26/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 16/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

45/100

C

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · AYUD-R.BKLocal privado en este navegador · Allianz Ayudhya Capital Public Company Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$15.5B

P/E

5.6x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

17.7%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$40
$32$40

TradingView lightweight chart

AYUD-R.BK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $36.50Periodo +71.4%
Fair value: $39.75

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+20.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.7%

FCF / Net income

-0.27x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $12.27B · net income $2.60B · FCF $-702.9M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

21.2%+6.8% pts

FCF margin

-5.7%-78.0% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$12.27B$12.27B$9.39B$8.72B$7.02B
Net Income$2.60B$2.60B$2.50B$933.0M$1.00B
EPS6.676.676.422.402.58
Net Margin21.2%21.2%26.6%10.7%14.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.010.020.02
Current Ratio15.0915.09———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-702.9M$-702.9M$938.2M$-1.11B$5.07B
Returns
ROE17.7%17.7%20.2%9.0%8.5%
Valuation
P/E5.585.584.8715.9716.18
P/B1.061.060.981.441.37
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth30.7%30.7%7.6%24.3%—
EPS Growth3.9%3.9%167.5%-7.0%—
Dividend Yield6.4%6.4%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-19.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$3.53

Spread vs growth

23.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-8.5%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$4.27

Spread vs growth

12.4%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

0.3%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$6.87

Spread vs growth

3.6%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +22.2%

Total return

+22.2%

Start / end P/E

4.9x → 5.5x

EPS bridge

6.42 → 6.67

Residual

+0.4%

EPS growth+3.9%
Multiple rerating+11.5%
Dividend+6.4%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.4%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.