StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BANSALWIRE.NS$306.85-0.50%
Fair $306.85+0.0%

BANSALWIRE.NS

BANSALWIRE.NS

Basic Materials / SteelNSE

$306.85

-1.55 (-0.50%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $306.85Fund rank 23/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 47/C
F-Score: 6/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 17%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.2B · quality 39.7/100

Data gap 23/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 5/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

47/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · BANSALWIRE.NSLocal privado en este navegador · BANSALWIRE.NS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$48.0B

P/E

29.9x

↑

EV/EBITDA

16.7x

↑

ROE

11.2%

↑

Gross Margin

23.3%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.39

↑
52-Week Range$307
$223$434

TradingView lightweight chart

BANSALWIRE.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $306.85Periodo -12.4%
Fair value: $306.85

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+20.2%

FCF CAGR

+21.5%

FCF margin

2.4%

FCF / Net income

0.62x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $41.60B · net income $1.61B · FCF $1.01B

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

23.3%+16.1% pts

Operating margin

6.1%+2.1% pts

Net margin

3.9%+1.4% pts

FCF margin

2.4%+0.1% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$41.60B$41.60B$35.07B$24.49B$23.94B
Net Income$1.61B$1.61B$1.45B$736.2M$599.3M
EBITDA$3.21B$3.21B$2.76B$1.50B$1.13B
EPS——9.734.703.83
Gross Margin23.3%23.3%22.3%9.9%7.3%
Operating Margin6.1%6.1%6.7%5.4%4.0%
Net Margin3.9%3.9%4.1%3.0%2.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.390.390.481.611.47
Current Ratio1.641.64———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.01B$1.01B$-6.16B$-10.11B$560.4M
Returns
ROE11.2%11.2%11.4%17.4%21.2%
Valuation
P/E29.8829.8837.00——
EV/EBITDA16.7116.7121.60——
P/B3.363.364.22——
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth18.6%18.6%43.2%2.3%—
EPS Growth——106.9%22.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -16.0%

Total return

-16.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

9.73 → n/d

Residual

-16.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-16.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.