StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BBHI.JK$1055.00+6.03%
Fair $1055.00+0.0%

BBHI.JK

PT Allo Bank Indonesia Tbk

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalJakarta

$1055.00

+60.00 (+6.03%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $1055.00Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 50/C
F-Score: 6/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 26.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 40/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

50/100

C

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BBHI.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT Allo Bank Indonesia Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$22.81T

P/E

42.3x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

7.7%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$1055
$645$1695

TradingView lightweight chart

BBHI.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $1,055Periodo +3830.9%
Fair value: $1,055

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+37.3%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

156.0%

FCF / Net income

5.35x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.97T · net income $574.26B · FCF $3.07T

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

29.2%-6.3% pts

FCF margin

156.0%+694.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1968.80B$1968.80B$1439.90B$1151.41B$761.13B
Net Income$574.26B$574.26B$467.11B$444.57B$270.03B
EPS26.4626.4621.5020.4612.43
Net Margin29.2%29.2%32.4%38.6%35.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.000.000.01
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3070.88B$3070.88B$763.14B$2247.26B$-4101.42B
Returns
ROE7.7%7.7%6.4%6.5%4.2%
Valuation
P/E42.2542.2534.1964.76136.36
P/B3.053.052.204.185.75
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth36.7%36.7%25.1%51.3%—
EPS Growth23.1%23.1%5.1%64.6%—
Dividend Yield0.8%0.8%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

52.4%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$93.61

Spread vs growth

-29.3%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

33.8%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$113.27

Spread vs growth

-10.7%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

21.3%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$182.43

Spread vs growth

1.8%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +42.4%

Total return

+42.4%

Start / end P/E

34.7x → 39.9x

EPS bridge

21.50 → 26.46

Residual

+3.5%

EPS growth+23.1%
Multiple rerating+15.1%
Dividend+0.8%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+3.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.