StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BCI.AX$0.34-1.43%
Fair $0.34+0.0%

BCI.AX

BCI Minerals Limited

Basic Materials / SteelASX

$0.34

-0.00 (-1.43%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.34Fund rank 31/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 18/F
F-Score: 0/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 24%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-243.1M · quality 68.0/100

Data gap 31/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 38/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

18/100

F

Piotroski

0/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

20/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 5Warnings: 1unknown: 5
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -6.1%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · BCI.AXLocal privado en este navegador · BCI Minerals Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.0B

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-6.1%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.48

↑
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

BCI.AX price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.345Periodo +60.7%
Fair value: $0.345

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2021–2025 · 4 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

8.77x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-47.0M · FCF $-412.6M

2021-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
Income Statement
Revenue———$60.2M$63.0M$184.7M
Net Income$-47.0M$-47.0M$-15.3M$9.4M$-15.5M—
EBITDA$-61.0M$-61.0M$-43.4M$16.3M$-9.8M—
EPS-0.02-0.02-0.010.01-0.02—
Gross Margin———49.7%40.7%50.9%
Operating Margin———-26.6%-28.9%—
Net Margin———15.6%-24.6%—
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.480.480.140.240.05—
Current Ratio4.634.63————
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-412.6M$-412.6M$-243.1M$-231.5M$-103.1M—
Returns
ROE-6.1%-6.1%-1.9%2.2%-3.6%—
Valuation
P/E———34.41——
EV/EBITDA———19.29——
P/B1.301.300.550.740.50—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth———-4.5%-65.9%—
EPS Growth-89.3%-89.3%-213.8%145.3%——

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +16.9%

Total return

+16.9%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.01 → -0.02

Residual

+16.9%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+16.9%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.