StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BEC.SI$4.68+2.18%
Fair $4.68+0.0%

BEC.SI

BRC Asia Limited

Basic Materials / SteelSES

$4.68

+0.10 (+2.18%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $4.68Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 54/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 25% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $156.3M · quality 71.3/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 67/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

54/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · BEC.SILocal privado en este navegador · BRC Asia Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.3B

P/E

12.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

9.3x

↓

ROE

18.3%

↑

Gross Margin

10.3%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.42

↑
52-Week Range$5
$3$5

TradingView lightweight chart

BEC.SI price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $4.680Periodo +307.0%
Fair value: $4.680

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-3.0%

FCF CAGR

+36.2%

FCF margin

7.5%

FCF / Net income

1.23x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.55B · net income $94.3M · FCF $116.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

10.3%+1.2% pts

Operating margin

7.1%+0.8% pts

Net margin

6.1%+0.8% pts

FCF margin

7.5%+4.8% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1.55B$1.55B$1.48B$1.63B$1.70B
Net Income$94.3M$94.3M$93.5M$75.7M$90.2M
EBITDA$138.9M$138.9M$141.6M$122.5M$132.3M
EPS——0.340.280.33
Gross Margin10.3%10.3%10.4%8.5%9.0%
Operating Margin7.1%7.1%6.8%5.9%6.4%
Net Margin6.1%6.1%6.3%4.7%5.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.420.420.520.891.15
Current Ratio2.102.10———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$116.4M$116.4M$188.7M$156.3M$46.0M
Returns
ROE18.3%18.3%19.7%17.7%22.6%
Valuation
P/E12.3212.326.866.084.97
EV/EBITDA9.339.334.925.365.68
P/B2.492.491.351.081.12
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth4.8%4.8%-9.0%-4.3%—
EPS Growth——23.5%-16.4%—
Dividend Yield3.1%3.1%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +52.6%

Total return

+52.6%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

0.34 → n/d

Residual

+49.5%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+3.1%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+49.5%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.