StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BEKS.JK$22.00+4.55%
Fair $22.00+0.0%

BEKS.JK

PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah Banten, Tbk

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalJakarta

$22.00

+1.00 (+4.55%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $22.00Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 35/D
F-Score: 6/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 8.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 20/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

35/100

D

Piotroski

6/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is 2.8%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · BEKS.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT. Bank Pembangunan Daerah Banten, Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.14T

P/E

22.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

2.8%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$22
$21$40

TradingView lightweight chart

BEKS.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $23.00Periodo -66.3%
Fair value: $22.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+0.9%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

202.0%

FCF / Net income

10.84x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $281.73B · net income $52.52B · FCF $569.22B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

18.6%+106.0% pts

FCF margin

202.0%+426.3% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$281.73B$281.73B$237.61B$273.64B$273.88B
Net Income$52.52B$52.52B$39.33B$26.59B$-239.29B
EPS1.011.010.750.51-4.61
Net Margin18.6%18.6%16.6%9.7%-87.4%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.000.000.030.00
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$569.22B$569.22B$191.11B$-359.30B$-614.18B
Returns
ROE2.8%2.8%2.3%1.6%-14.6%
Valuation
P/E22.5522.5542.6798.04—
P/B0.630.630.971.551.58
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth18.6%18.6%-13.2%-0.1%—
EPS Growth34.7%34.7%47.1%111.1%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

24.6%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$1.95

Spread vs growth

10.1%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

18.5%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$2.36

Spread vs growth

16.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

14.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$3.80

Spread vs growth

20.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -11.5%

Total return

-11.5%

Start / end P/E

34.7x → 22.8x

EPS bridge

0.75 → 1.01

Residual

-11.9%

EPS growth+34.7%
Multiple rerating-34.3%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-11.9%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.