StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BNBA.JK$705.00+6.02%
Fair $705.00+0.0%

BNBA.JK

PT Bank Bumi Arta Tbk

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalJakarta

$705.00

+40.00 (+6.02%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $705.00Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 22/D
F-Score: 4/9
Declining RevenueLow Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 5.0/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 0/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

22/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 2unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. Revenue has declined for 2 consecutive years ROE is 0.3%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · BNBA.JKLocal privado en este navegador · PT Bank Bumi Arta Tbk
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$2.39T

P/E

1052.2x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

0.3%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.01

↓
52-Week Range$705
$600$1400

TradingView lightweight chart

BNBA.JK price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $705.00Periodo +266.6%
Fair value: $705.00

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

-2.7%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

36.7%

FCF / Net income

13.02x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $336.36B · net income $9.47B · FCF $123.30B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

2.8%-7.8% pts

FCF margin

36.7%+336.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$336.36B$336.36B$361.66B$370.12B$365.38B
Net Income$9.47B$9.47B$61.40B$44.37B$38.94B
EPS——18.1213.1013.79
Net Margin2.8%2.8%17.0%12.0%10.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.010.010.020.010.01
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$123.30B$123.30B$-366.87B$-255.00B$-1095.20B
Returns
ROE0.3%0.3%1.9%1.4%1.3%
Valuation
P/E1052.241052.2433.6658.0266.72
P/B0.740.740.650.820.84
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-7.0%-7.0%-2.3%1.3%—
EPS Growth——38.3%-5.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -14.0%

Total return

-14.0%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

18.12 → n/d

Residual

-14.0%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-14.0%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.