StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
BPAT.BA$2195.00+0.92%
Fair $2195.00+0.0%

BPAT.BA

Banco Patagonia S.A.

Financial Services / Banks - RegionalBuenos Aires

$2195.00

+20.00 (+0.92%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $2195.00Fund rank 32/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 37/D
F-Score: 3/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 53.0/100

Data gap 32/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 45/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

37/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · BPAT.BALocal privado en este navegador · Banco Patagonia S.A.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$1.58T

P/E

14.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

6.6%

↑

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.46

↑
52-Week Range$2195
$1130$3100

TradingView lightweight chart

BPAT.BA price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $2,195Periodo +51305.2%
Fair value: $2,195

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+31.6%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

41.1%

FCF / Net income

4.95x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.32T · net income $109.11B · FCF $540.50B

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

8.3%-1.7% pts

FCF margin

41.1%+42.4% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$1315.05B$1315.05B$2118.45B$1966.29B$576.38B
Net Income$109.11B$109.11B$271.78B$183.61B$57.80B
EPS151.72151.72377.92255.3180.37
Net Margin8.3%8.3%12.8%9.3%10.0%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.460.460.040.090.13
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$540.50B$540.50B$605.76B$128.76B$-7.42B
Returns
ROE6.6%6.6%15.8%14.9%11.5%
Valuation
P/E14.4614.467.992.371.74
P/B0.950.951.260.350.20
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-37.9%-37.9%7.7%241.1%—
EPS Growth-59.9%-59.9%48.0%217.7%—
Dividend Yield15.0%15.0%———

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

8.7%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$194.77

Spread vs growth

-68.5%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

9.2%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$235.67

Spread vs growth

-69.1%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

9.6%

razonable

EPS terminal req.

$379.55

Spread vs growth

-69.5%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5.9%

Total return

+5.9%

Start / end P/E

6.4x → 14.5x

EPS bridge

377.92 → 151.72

Residual

-75.6%

EPS growth-59.9%
Multiple rerating+126.4%
Dividend+15.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-75.6%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.