StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CAF.V$0.32-1.56%
Fair $0.32+0.0%

CAF.V

Canaf Investments Inc.

Basic Materials / Coking CoalTSXV

$0.32

-0.00 (-1.56%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.32Fund rank 34/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 46/C
F-Score: 5/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 24% · confianza 25%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $2.9M · quality 65.3/100

Data gap 34/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 79/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

46/100

C

Piotroski

5/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · CAF.VLocal privado en este navegador · Canaf Investments Inc.
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$15M

P/E

6.3x

↓

EV/EBITDA

1.4x

↓

ROE

16.4%

↑

Gross Margin

13.6%

↓

Debt/Equity

N/A

•
52-Week Range$0
$0$0

TradingView lightweight chart

CAF.V price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.315Periodo +16.7%
Fair value: $0.315

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+7.6%

FCF CAGR

+23.1%

FCF margin

12.3%

FCF / Net income

1.41x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $27.7M · net income $2.4M · FCF $3.4M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

13.6%+3.0% pts

Operating margin

10.0%+2.7% pts

Net margin

8.7%+4.1% pts

FCF margin

12.3%+4.1% pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$27.7M$27.7M$32.7M$32.3M$22.2M
Net Income$2.4M$2.4M$2.2M$2.2M$1.0M
EBITDA$3.9M$3.9M$3.6M$3.8M$2.2M
EPS0.050.050.050.050.02
Gross Margin13.6%13.6%10.9%12.2%10.6%
Operating Margin10.0%10.0%8.1%9.4%7.3%
Net Margin8.7%8.7%6.6%6.9%4.6%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity——0.000.010.01
Current Ratio7.047.04———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$3.4M$3.4M$2.9M$2.0M$1.8M
Returns
ROE16.4%16.4%18.1%24.6%15.0%
Valuation
P/E6.306.306.743.624.61
EV/EBITDA1.371.371.980.740.51
P/B1.011.011.230.890.69
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth-15.5%-15.5%1.3%45.6%—
EPS Growth10.9%10.9%-2.1%116.5%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-18.2%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

29.0%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-7.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

18.8%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

0.7%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.05

Spread vs growth

10.2%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +5.0%

Total return

+5.0%

Start / end P/E

6.5x → 6.2x

EPS bridge

0.05 → 0.05

Residual

-0.6%

EPS growth+10.9%
Multiple rerating-5.3%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-0.6%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.