StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CAIROMEZ.AT$0.24+6.00%
Fair $0.24+0.0%

CAIROMEZ.AT

Cairo Mezz Plc

Financial Services / Capital MarketsAthens

$0.24

+0.01 (+6.00%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $0.24Fund rank 30/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 28/D
F-Score: 2/9
Low Profitability

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 46.0/100

Data gap 30/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 39/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

28/100

D

Piotroski

2/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified. ROE is -64.7%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CAIROMEZ.ATLocal privado en este navegador · Cairo Mezz Plc
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$74M

P/E

0.8x

↓

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-64.7%

↓

Gross Margin

N/A

•

Debt/Equity

0.00

↓
52-Week Range$0
$0$1

TradingView lightweight chart

CAIROMEZ.AT price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $0.238Periodo +194.1%
Fair value: $0.238

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

—

FCF / Net income

0.00x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue — · net income $-94.3M · FCF $-365059.0

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

—— pts

Operating margin

—— pts

Net margin

—— pts

FCF margin

—— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue———$123.0M$-1.0M
Net Income$-94.3M$-94.3M$60.9M$122.7M$-1.3M
EBITDA$-94.3M$-94.3M$60.9M$122.7M$-1.3M
EPS0.310.310.200.40-0.00
Operating Margin———99.8%130.7%
Net Margin———99.8%130.7%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.000.00———
Current Ratio1.441.44———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-365059.00$-365059.00$-366967.00$-325615.00$-324503.00
Returns
ROE-64.7%-64.7%25.4%68.5%-2.3%
Valuation
P/E0.770.772.210.48—
EV/EBITDA——2.210.48—
P/B0.510.510.560.330.48
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth———12293.1%—
EPS Growth54.8%54.8%-50.4%9334.9%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

-58.9%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.02

Spread vs growth

113.8%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

-39.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.03

Spread vs growth

93.9%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

-18.1%

fácil

EPS terminal req.

$0.04

Spread vs growth

73.0%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -41.8%

Total return

-41.8%

Start / end P/E

2.1x → 0.8x

EPS bridge

0.20 → 0.31

Residual

-34.2%

EPS growth+54.8%
Multiple rerating-62.4%
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-34.2%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.