StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CAMEXLTD.BO$38.70-2.97%
Fair $38.70+0.0%

CAMEXLTD.BO

Camex Limited

Basic Materials / Specialty ChemicalsBSE

$38.70

-1.20 (-2.97%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $38.70Fund rank 24/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 60/B
F-Score: 3/9

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 34% · confianza 18%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $4.4M · quality 43.7/100

Data gap 24/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 6/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

60/100

B

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 0unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists.
Thesis & Journal · CAMEXLTD.BOLocal privado en este navegador · Camex Limited
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$395M

P/E

12.1x

↓

EV/EBITDA

7.6x

↓

ROE

7.0%

↑

Gross Margin

11.8%

↓

Debt/Equity

0.17

↓
52-Week Range$39
$26$50

TradingView lightweight chart

CAMEXLTD.BO price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $39.25Periodo +802.3%
Fair value: $38.70

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2023–2026 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+4.5%

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-5.5%

FCF / Net income

-2.51x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $1.50B · net income $32.5M · FCF $-81.7M

2023-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

11.8%+6.7% pts

Operating margin

3.3%+2.9% pts

Net margin

2.2%+1.7% pts

FCF margin

-5.5%-2.9% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
2024
2023
Income Statement
Revenue$1.50B$1.50B$1.34B$1.40B$1.31B
Net Income$32.5M$32.5M$18.9M$34.6M$6.1M
EBITDA$61.8M$61.8M$47.2M$57.1M$20.0M
EPS——1.833.370.60
Gross Margin11.8%11.8%11.3%8.3%5.2%
Operating Margin3.3%3.3%2.5%3.6%0.3%
Net Margin2.2%2.2%1.4%2.5%0.5%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.170.170.030.190.13
Current Ratio3.003.00———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-81.7M$-81.7M$4.4M$46.9M$-34.1M
Returns
ROE7.0%7.0%4.4%8.5%1.6%
Valuation
P/E12.0612.0620.9312.7344.72
EV/EBITDA7.647.648.167.4015.43
P/B0.860.860.931.070.73
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth11.9%11.9%-4.7%7.1%—
EPS Growth——-45.7%462.7%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total +0.7%

Total return

+0.7%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

1.83 → n/d

Residual

+0.7%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term+0.7%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.