StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CANATU.HE$9.50-5.39%
Fair $9.50+0.0%

CANATU.HE

Canatu Oyj

Basic Materials / Specialty ChemicalsHelsinki

$9.50

-0.55 (-5.39%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $9.50Fund rank 29/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 26/D
F-Score: 4/9
Low Profitability

FCF base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · yield n/d

FCF base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 33% · confianza 23%

FCF escenarios

weak_data · normalized FCF $-6.1M · quality 65.7/100

Data gap 29/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 30/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

26/100

D

Piotroski

4/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

16/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 4Warnings: 1unknown: 4
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Sector-specific commodity mid-cycle model required: targets are disabled until normalized cycle price/cost-curve/reserve data exists. ROE is -9.0%, below the 5% threshold
Thesis & Journal · CANATU.HELocal privado en este navegador · Canatu Oyj
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$320M

P/E

N/A

•

EV/EBITDA

N/A

•

ROE

-9.0%

↓

Gross Margin

84.6%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$10
$7$12

TradingView lightweight chart

CANATU.HE price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $9.650Periodo -8.2%
Fair value: $9.500

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2022–2025 · 3 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

—

FCF CAGR

—

FCF margin

-39.1%

FCF / Net income

0.63x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $15.6M · net income $-9.7M · FCF $-6.1M

2022-FY → 2025-FY

Gross margin

84.6%— pts

Operating margin

-67.9%— pts

Net margin

-62.2%— pts

FCF margin

-39.1%— pts
MetricTTM
2025
2024
2023
2022
Income Statement
Revenue$15.6M$15.6M$3.3M——
Net Income$-9.7M$-9.7M$-3.6M$2.0M$-1.6M
EBITDA$-7.1M$-7.1M$-2.9M$2.0M$-289931.78
EPS-0.29-0.29-0.200.16-0.62
Gross Margin84.6%84.6%66.7%——
Operating Margin-67.9%-67.9%-160.6%——
Net Margin-62.2%-62.2%-109.1%——
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.020.05——
Current Ratio11.9011.90———
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$-6.1M$-6.1M$-8.1M$-1.2M$-452857.56
Returns
ROE-9.0%-9.0%-3.2%1.9%-65.2%
Valuation
P/E———60.62—
EV/EBITDA———60.42—
P/B2.962.961.911.1710.67
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth372.7%372.7%———
EPS Growth-45.0%-45.0%-225.0%125.8%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%
Reverse DCF requires positive EPS; loss-making or zero-EPS companies cannot produce a clean EPS hurdle.

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · 1Y approxreconcilia total -2.3%

Total return

-2.3%

Start / end P/E

n/dx → n/dx

EPS bridge

-0.20 → -0.29

Residual

-2.3%

EPS growthn/d
Multiple reratingn/d
Dividend+0.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-2.3%

EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.