StockAnalyzer

Financial Analysis

DashboardSectorsComparablesScreenerUniverseMicrocapsAI 2nd OrderTheme MapEnergy & MaterialsMacroWatchlistCompareMi CarteraPortfolio

Recent

v0.1
CRAMC.NS$250.12+0.32%
Fair $250.12+0.0%

CRAMC.NS

CRAMC.NS

Financial Services / Asset ManagementNSE

$250.12

+0.79 (+0.32%)

Fairly Valued+0.0%Fair Value $250.12Fund rank 35/100 · Data gapFallback financials|
SA 38/D
F-Score: 3/9

Book/ROE base 3Y

n/d

n/d CAGR · P/B n/d

Book/ROE base 5Y

n/d

n/d base · n/d expected

Precio de entrada

n/d

MOS 100% · confianza 20%

Book/ROE escenarios

weak_data · book/share n/d · quality 100.0/100

Data gap 35/100
Bear 5Yn/dn/d
Base 5Yn/dn/d
Bull 5Yn/dn/d
Return 0/100Downside 20/100Model quality 63/100Data QA 20/100

Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.

Quality + valuation scorecard

SA Score

38/100

D

Piotroski

3/9

balance/quality

Valuation

50/100

+0.0% upside

5Y CAGR

+0.0%

50/100

Data QA

8/100

SEC 0%

Latest source: unknownPeriods: 2Warnings: 0unknown: 2
No SEC-backed annual rows; valuation uses fallback financial data. Limited financial history; valuation confidence should be treated as provisional. Insufficient audited annual history (<3 SEC-backed years); financial Book/ROE targets are disabled until manually verified.
Thesis & Journal · CRAMC.NSLocal privado en este navegador · CRAMC.NS
Plantilla tipo buy-side: tesis, bull/base/bear, catalizadores, riesgos, kill criteria y fecha de revisión. Esto no gasta GPT-5.5; luego lo usamos como contexto del memo.

Sin guardar todavía.

Market Cap

$49.9B

P/E

24.5x

↑

EV/EBITDA

17.6x

↑

ROE

27.3%

↑

Gross Margin

74.8%

↑

Debt/Equity

0.02

↓
52-Week Range$250
$214$353

TradingView lightweight chart

CRAMC.NS price, volumen y niveles de valoración

Último $250.12Periodo -16.8%
Fair value: $250.12

Price & Ratios

Absolute Values (Left Axis)

Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)

Financial statement dashboard

Crecimiento, márgenes y provenance

2025–2026 · 1 años de histórico normalizado

Revenue CAGR

+16.6%

FCF CAGR

+7.5%

FCF margin

39.1%

FCF / Net income

0.82x

Latest source

Provider fallback

Margin decomposition

Último año: revenue $4.25B · net income $2.04B · FCF $1.66B

2025-FY → 2026-FY

Gross margin

74.8%-0.9% pts

Operating margin

58.1%-2.2% pts

Net margin

48.0%-4.4% pts

FCF margin

39.1%-3.3% pts
MetricTTM
2026
2025
Income Statement
Revenue$4.25B$4.25B$3.65B
Net Income$2.04B$2.04B$1.91B
EBITDA$2.84B$2.84B$2.64B
EPS10.2210.229.56
Gross Margin74.8%74.8%75.7%
Operating Margin58.1%58.1%60.3%
Net Margin48.0%48.0%52.3%
Balance Sheet
Debt/Equity0.020.02—
Current Ratio5.975.97—
Cash Flow
Free Cash Flow$1.66B$1.66B$1.55B
Returns
ROE27.3%27.3%—
Valuation
P/E24.4724.47—
EV/EBITDA17.6217.62—
P/B6.696.69—
Growth & Yield
Revenue Growth16.6%16.6%—
EPS Growth6.9%6.9%—
Dividend Yield2.0%2.0%—

Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)

Margins (%)

Returns (%)

Leverage & Liquidity

Reverse DCF · market-implied EPS growthterminal P/E 15.0x · COE 10.0%

3Y implied EPS CAGR

29.5%

muy exigente

EPS terminal req.

$22.19

Spread vs growth

-22.6%

5Y implied EPS CAGR

21.3%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$26.85

Spread vs growth

-14.4%

10Y implied EPS CAGR

15.5%

exigente

EPS terminal req.

$43.25

Spread vs growth

-8.6%

Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.

Return attribution · available periodreconcilia total -14.7%

Total return

-14.7%

Start / end P/E

31.4x → 24.5x

EPS bridge

9.56 → 10.22

Residual

-1.5%

EPS growth+6.9%
Multiple rerating-22.1%
Dividend+2.0%
Residual / FX / buybacks / cross-term-1.5%

Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.