Basic Materials / Agricultural InputsNYSE
$67.20
-0.01 (-0.01%)
FCF base 3Y
n/d
n/d CAGR · yield n/d
FCF base 5Y
n/d
n/d base · n/d expected
Precio de entrada
n/d
MOS 24% · confianza 25%
FCF escenarios
weak_data · normalized FCF $1.5B · quality 70.0/100
Ranking barato/determinista: CAGR esperado 5Y + downside bear + calidad del modelo + balance + capital allocation + data gate. No entra en buy-candidate si la data es débil o el CAGR 5Y no compensa.
SA Score
35/100
D
Piotroski
6/9
balance/quality
Valuation
50/100
+0.0% upside
5Y CAGR
+0.0%
50/100
Data QA
20/100
SEC 0%
Sin guardar todavía.
Market Cap
$0
P/E
N/A
•EV/EBITDA
14.1x
↑ROE
4.5%
↑Gross Margin
47.3%
↑Debt/Equity
0.11
↓TradingView lightweight chart
Absolute Values (Left Axis)
Ratios / Percentages (Right Axis)
Financial statement dashboard
2008–2025 · 17 años de histórico normalizado
Revenue CAGR
-3.3%
FCF CAGR
+5.4%
FCF margin
16.2%
FCF / Net income
2.57x
Latest source
Provider fallback
Margin decomposition
Último año: revenue $17.40B · net income $1.09B · FCF $2.81B
Gross margin
Operating margin
Net margin
FCF margin
| Metric | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenue | $17.40B | $17.40B | $16.91B | $17.23B | $17.45B | — | — | $24.59B | $25.13B | $28.41B | $29.00B | $34.81B | $33.68B | $27.70B | $26.11B | $30.53B |
| Net Income | $1.09B | $1.09B | $907.0M | $735.0M | $1.15B | — | — | $2.51B | $1.95B | $3.63B | $4.85B | $2.75B | $3.56B | $3.03B | $1.75B | $2.01B |
| EBITDA | $3.07B | $3.07B | $2.73B | $2.54B | $2.73B | — | — | — | — | $7.97B | $6.97B | $7.08B | $7.44B | $5.99B | $4.84B | — |
| EPS | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2.85 | 2.16 | 3.92 | 5.18 | 2.91 | 3.77 | 3.28 | 1.92 | 2.20 |
| Gross Margin | 47.3% | 47.3% | 43.6% | 42.4% | 40.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.1% | 15.1% | 12.4% | 12.2% | 11.0% | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | 18.5% | 15.4% | 17.5% | 16.7% | 12.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 6.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | 4.3% | 6.6% | — | — | 10.2% | 7.8% | 12.8% | 16.7% | 7.9% | 10.6% | 10.9% | 6.7% | 6.6% |
| Balance Sheet | ||||||||||||||||
| Debt/Equity | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.05 | — | — | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.66 | 1.02 | 1.36 | 1.09 | 1.32 | — |
| Current Ratio | 1.47 | 1.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Cash Flow | ||||||||||||||||
| Free Cash Flow | $2.81B | $2.81B | $1.55B | $1.17B | $267.0M | — | — | $2.28B | $687.0M | $1.69B | $1.30B | $3.06B | $3.31B | $3.05B | $3.43B | $1.15B |
| Returns | ||||||||||||||||
| ROE | 4.5% | 4.5% | 3.8% | 2.9% | 4.5% | — | — | 25.1% | 19.5% | 27.2% | 29.9% | 27.0% | 41.4% | 32.7% | 24.3% | — |
| Valuation | ||||||||||||||||
| EV/EBITDA | 14.08 | 14.08 | 18.14 | 19.19 | 21.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| P/B | 1.87 | 1.87 | 2.10 | 1.95 | 2.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Growth & Yield | ||||||||||||||||
| Revenue Growth | 2.9% | 2.9% | -1.8% | -1.3% | — | — | — | -2.1% | -11.5% | -2.0% | -16.7% | 3.4% | 21.6% | 6.1% | -14.5% | — |
| EPS Growth | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31.9% | -44.9% | -24.3% | 78.0% | -22.8% | 14.9% | 70.8% | -12.7% | — |
| Dividend Yield | 6.7% | 6.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Revenue, Net Income & Free Cash Flow ($B)
Margins (%)
Returns (%)
Leverage & Liquidity
Qué te dice: cuánto EPS CAGR está descontando el precio si sales al múltiplo terminal indicado. Si el growth observado queda por debajo, el mercado está pidiendo una ejecución muy fina.
Total return
+6.0%
Start / end P/E
n/dx → n/dx
EPS bridge
n/d → n/d
Residual
-0.7%
EPS/multiple decomposition requires positive EPS at both endpoints; residual absorbs price move not explained by dividends.
Simple additive decomposition: total return = EPS growth contribution + P/E multiple contribution + dividend contribution + explicit residual. The residual captures cross-terms, buybacks/share-count effects, FX, special dividends, data noise and methodology mismatch so the bridge always reconciles.